Re: Allowing NULL for some internal functions

From: Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2021 17:32:02 +0000
Subject: Re: Allowing NULL for some internal functions
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-116561@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Thu, Dec 2, 2021, 10:20 PM Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net> wrote: I'm not hard against this idea. The interpretation of null in these > contexts as being equivalent to empty string isn't unreasonable. I guess > the only objection I could have would be an academic one and I can't really > defend that. So yeah, sure... why not? > > I would say that such applications should consider unifying their own > types. $a = $_GET['q'] ?? ''; Is there a place in the application where > empty string and null would have been distinct? i.e. Is a search for > nothing different from not searching? > I wonder what is the technical benefit from that? I do feel we are moving to a strict typed language. If that is what is desired, then let decide it clearly and move forward to rhst direction. best, Pierre >

« previous php.internals (#116561) next »