Re: Broken Wiki Registraiton (was: [IDEA] allow extending enum)

On Thu, Mar 30, 2023, at 4:27 PM, Derick Rethans wrote: > On 30 March 2023 14:56:55 BST, Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com> wrote: >>On Thu, Mar 30, 2023, at 9:25 AM, Christian Schneider wrote: >>> Am 30.03.2023 um 10:50 schrieb Lynn <kjarli@gmail.com>: >> >> >>>> , and most importantly you have to remind yourself.every time to press "reply >>>> all". >>> >>> As it is sufficient to just reply to the mailing list this could >>> technically be changed by adding a Reply-To. The downside would be that >>> it makes private replies harder and the occasional slip-up could send a >>> private reply to the list instead. >>> IMHO private replies should be kept to a minimum so I think >>> (re-)considering adding a Reply-To might be worth it. >> >> Most mail clients I've used in the past decade have a "reply to list" >> function that I use extensively, which works quite well. >> That said, I am really sick of getting >> double copies of every reply in a thread after I've posted >> in it, so I would be delighted to update Reply-To to go back >> to the list only if it means I get >> less duplicate email. :-) > > Please no. As it's a destructive operation that you can't easily work > around in email clients. Trimming recipients is doable. Then we need a cultural shift to get people to trim more, because I got two copies of your email, which show together in a thread even when I filter email separately. --Larry Garfield