Re: [RFC] New core autoloading mechanism with support for function autoloading

I don’t like the proposed function names: autoload_register_class to me reads like “register this class for autoloading”. If I observe the intended meaning correctly, it should be called “register_class_autoloader”. Same for autoload_register_function - better name would be “register_function_autoloader”. Other functions should be renamed accordingly. Function names should read like a sentence, like a command. On Mon 10. 4. 2023 at 14:17, G. P. B. <george.banyard@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Internals, > > Dan and I would like to propose a new core autoloading mechanism that fixes > some minor design issues with the current class autoloading mechanism and > introduce a brand-new function autoloading mechanism: > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/core-autoloading > > The existing SPL autoloading functions would become aliases to the new Core > ones and will continue to work without any migrations needing to be > performed. > > Hope to hear your opinions about this! > > Best regards, > > George P. Banyard > -- Ondřej Mirtes