Re: [RFC] New core autoloading mec hanism with support for function autoloading
| From: | Rowan Tommins | Date: | Thu, 13 Apr 2023 07:08:16 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] New core autoloading mec hanism with support for function autoloading | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-120015@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 12 April 2023 23:50:25 BST, Dan Ackroyd <Danack@basereality.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 at 17:32, Claude Pache <claude.pache@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The proposed modification of
function_exists() will break
>> existing code:
>
>Please can you submit a failing test to
>https://github.com/Girgias/php-src/tree/zend_autoloader that
>shows a
>BC break.
I'm not sure how to interpret this. Are you saying you agree that the behaviour should not
change, plan to update the RFC, and are asking for help picking good examples to come up with a new
implementation? Or are you expressing disbelief that the behaviour change is actually a BC break,
because the examples so far haven't convinced you?
Regards,
--
Rowan Tommins
[IMSoP]