Re: [RFC] [Discussion] DOM HTML5 parsing and serialization support
| From: | Ben Ramsey | Date: | Tue, 05 Sep 2023 01:31:00 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] [Discussion] DOM HTML5 parsing and serialization support | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-120984@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 9/2/23 14:41, Niels Dossche wrote:
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature OpenPGP_signature.asc
I'm opening the discussion for my RFC "DOM HTML5 parsing and serialization support". https://wiki.php.net/rfc/domdocument_html5_parserThanks, Niels. This is much needed.
This proposal introduces the DOM\HTML5Document class that extends the DOMDocument class.In light of the recent discussion regarding casing of acronyms in class and method names [1], perhaps this proposal should consider
Dom\Html5Document instead? I know this isn't consistent with the other DOMDocument classes, so maybe remaining consistent is better in this case.
I propose to use Lexbor.Lexbor is licensed under the Apache-2.0 license [2]. In general, I don't think this will present any problems, as long as we adhere to the terms of the license (i.e., include the NOTICE file, etc.), but I did want to call attention to it in case bundling the source code of an Apache-2.0 project within a PHP-3.01 project is a cause for concern for anyone. Cheers, Ben [1]: https://externals.io/message/120959 [2]: https://github.com/lexbor/lexbor/blob/master/LICENSE
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature OpenPGP_signature.asc