Fwd: [PHP-DEV][VOTE][RFC] mb_ucfirst and mb_lcfirst functions

From: Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 09:55:15 +0000
Subject: Fwd: [PHP-DEV][VOTE][RFC] mb_ucfirst and mb_lcfirst functions
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-122434@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: youkidearitai <youkidearitai@gmail.com> Date: 2024年2月19日(月) 18:46 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV][VOTE][RFC] mb_ucfirst and mb_lcfirst functions To: <internals@lists.php.net> 2024年2月7日(水) 5:19 youkidearitai <youkidearitai@gmail.com>: > > 2024年2月7日(水) 4:49 youkidearitai <youkidearitai@gmail.com>: > > > > 2024年2月7日(水) 2:56 Juliette Reinders Folmer > > <php-internals_nospam@adviesenzo.nl>: > > > > > > On 6-2-2024 3:40, youkidearitai wrote: > > > > 2024年2月6日(火) 8:33 Tim Starling <tstarling@wikimedia.org>: > > > >> On 2/2/24 20:27, youkidearitai wrote: > > > >> > > > >> I see. I'll change mb_ucfirst using titlecase. > > > >> > > > >> Per my comments a month ago on the GitHub issue , I think it is much better > > > >> to use title case for mb_ucfirst() than to use upper case, since conversion of the first character > > > >> to upper case has the effect of corrupting text in the Georgian script, and initial lower-case > > > >> ligatures are converted to a form which appears like two upper case letters. So I'm pleased to > > > >> see this change to the PR. > > > >> > > > >> I would appreciate it if the RFC could also be updated to include this > > > >> detail, since my vote depends on whether title case or upper case will be used. > > > >> > > > >> -- Tim Starling > > > > Hi, Tim > > > > > > > > Thank you for your comment. > > > > I modified to "uses unicode case title" in an RFC. > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > Yuya > > > > > > > > > > Help me out here, but doesn't changing what is actually proposed in an > > > RFC **after** the vote has started invalidate the vote ? > > > > > > Shouldn't the vote be closed/withdrawn and restarted in that case ? > > > > Hi, Internals. > > > > Juliette, Thank you for pointing. > > I'm mistake. > > > > I checked the following and it was exactly as I said. > > https://wiki.php.net/RFC/voting#voting > > > > > A valid voting period must be declared when voting is started and must not be changed > > > during the vote. > > > > I broke this rule. In this case, should I return to "Under discussion"? > > I apologize to those who voted, admitting lack of discussion, I want > > to reorganize. > > > > Regards > > Yuya > > Hi, Internals. > This an RFC is revert to "Under Discussion". > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/howto > Referenced Section 7.3: > > A serious issue with your RFC needs to be addressed: update the status of your RFC page > > and its section on https://wiki.php.net/RFC to “Under > > Discussion” and continue again from step 5. > > I would like to wait another two weeks to vote again. > Scheduled for February 21st, GMT 00:00 restart voting. > > Please feel free to comment. > > I apologize to everyone who voted again. > > Regards > Yuya > > -- > --------------------------- > Yuya Hamada (tekimen) > - https://tekitoh-memdhoi.info > - https://github.com/youkidearitai > ----------------------------- I send below message, but kicked by internals. Resend to it. Hi, Internals. This is a reminder. If nothing another comments, This an RFC restart voting at February 21st, GMT 00:00. Thank you. Regards Yuya -- --------------------------- Yuya Hamada (tekimen) - https://tekitoh-memdhoi.info - https://github.com/youkidearitai -----------------------------

« previous php.internals (#122434) next »