Fwd: [PHP-DEV][VOTE][RFC] mb_ucfirst and mb_lcfirst functions
| From: | youkidearitai | Date: | Mon, 19 Feb 2024 09:55:15 +0000 |
| Subject: | Fwd: [PHP-DEV][VOTE][RFC] mb_ucfirst and mb_lcfirst functions | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-122434@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: youkidearitai <youkidearitai@gmail.com>
Date: 2024年2月19日(月) 18:46
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV][VOTE][RFC] mb_ucfirst and mb_lcfirst functions
To: <internals@lists.php.net>
2024年2月7日(水) 5:19 youkidearitai <youkidearitai@gmail.com>:
>
> 2024年2月7日(水) 4:49 youkidearitai <youkidearitai@gmail.com>:
> >
> > 2024年2月7日(水) 2:56 Juliette Reinders Folmer
> > <php-internals_nospam@adviesenzo.nl>:
> > >
> > > On 6-2-2024 3:40, youkidearitai wrote:
> > > > 2024年2月6日(火) 8:33 Tim Starling <tstarling@wikimedia.org>:
> > > >> On 2/2/24 20:27, youkidearitai wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> I see. I'll change mb_ucfirst using titlecase.
> > > >>
> > > >> Per my comments a month ago on the GitHub issue , I think it is much better
> > > >> to use title case for mb_ucfirst() than to use upper case, since conversion of the first character
> > > >> to upper case has the effect of corrupting text in the Georgian script, and initial lower-case
> > > >> ligatures are converted to a form which appears like two upper case letters. So I'm pleased to
> > > >> see this change to the PR.
> > > >>
> > > >> I would appreciate it if the RFC could also be updated to include this
> > > >> detail, since my vote depends on whether title case or upper case will be used.
> > > >>
> > > >> -- Tim Starling
> > > > Hi, Tim
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for your comment.
> > > > I modified to "uses unicode case title" in an RFC.
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > Yuya
> > > >
> > >
> > > Help me out here, but doesn't changing what is actually proposed in an
> > > RFC **after** the vote has started invalidate the vote ?
> > >
> > > Shouldn't the vote be closed/withdrawn and restarted in that case ?
> >
> > Hi, Internals.
> >
> > Juliette, Thank you for pointing.
> > I'm mistake.
> >
> > I checked the following and it was exactly as I said.
> > https://wiki.php.net/RFC/voting#voting
> >
> > > A valid voting period must be declared when voting is started and must not be changed
> > > during the vote.
> >
> > I broke this rule. In this case, should I return to "Under discussion"?
> > I apologize to those who voted, admitting lack of discussion, I want
> > to reorganize.
> >
> > Regards
> > Yuya
>
> Hi, Internals.
> This an RFC is revert to "Under Discussion".
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/howto
> Referenced Section 7.3:
> > A serious issue with your RFC needs to be addressed: update the status of your RFC page
> > and its section on https://wiki.php.net/RFC to “Under
> > Discussion” and continue again from step 5.
>
> I would like to wait another two weeks to vote again.
> Scheduled for February 21st, GMT 00:00 restart voting.
>
> Please feel free to comment.
>
> I apologize to everyone who voted again.
>
> Regards
> Yuya
>
> --
> ---------------------------
> Yuya Hamada (tekimen)
> - https://tekitoh-memdhoi.info
> - https://github.com/youkidearitai
> -----------------------------
I send below message, but kicked by internals. Resend to it.
Hi, Internals.
This is a reminder.
If nothing another comments, This an RFC restart voting at February
21st, GMT 00:00.
Thank you.
Regards
Yuya
--
---------------------------
Yuya Hamada (tekimen)
- https://tekitoh-memdhoi.info
- https://github.com/youkidearitai
-----------------------------