Re: [RFC] [Discussion] Add openStream() to XML{Reader,Writer}

From: Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 17:47:36 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] [Discussion] Add openStream() to XML{Reader,Writer}
References: 1 2  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-123404@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 21/05/2024 21:58, Claude Pache wrote: > > >> Le 21 mai 2024 à 21:00, Matthew Weier O'Phinney <mweierophinney@gmail.com> a >> écrit : >> >> (But again, I prefer that all those methods work on instances, as it was the case >> before PHP 8. They shouldn’t have been switched to static-but-broken-for-subclasses without >> discussion.) >> >> >> Fixing the existing ones would be a potential BC break, depending on whether or not >> instance usage is completely eliminated. > > Yes, of course. But there exist options that don’t make the API even more inconsistent than > it already is. I hereby propose: > > * XMLReader::fromUrl() as replacement for (new > XMLReader)->open() > * XMLReader::fromString() as replacement for ­‚”©Y > ­ØU¿k¬‰Â¢(new XMLReader)->xml() > > … which would make me happy. (The old, inconsistently-named, instance-and-semi-broken-static > methods could be kept for BC and marked as soft-deprecated in the manual.) > > —Claude  Okay, that seems reasonable to me and I can do that. I'll make them return static and do "new static()" like I proposed with the new static method. For XMLWriter, I suppose we also want the static counterparts: * XMLWriter::toMemory() for (new XMLWriter)->openMemory() * XMLWriter::toUri() for (new XMLWriter)->openUri() If that sounds good I'll update the RFC. Niels

« previous php.internals (#123404) next »