Re: [RFC] Asymmetric Visibility, v2

On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 3:15 AM Lanre <lnearwaju@gmail.com> wrote: > Why invest time in crafting yet another pull request or RFC when it's > glaringly obvious that you guys have no clue what you're doing? First, > there's the questionable decision to implement JIT in 8.0, followed by the > introduction of an entirely new library (IR) to a language that's > predominantly request-based, boasting nothing more than a rudimentary AST, > plagued with inconsistencies, clinging to CGI, and practically useless > without a framework. And now, after greenlighting a dubious property hooks > RFC, the same individuals are embroiled in a debate over Asymmetric > Visibility? If you can't think up ways to make the engine "more rubust and > sturdy" as a paid member of the foundation then maybe it is also time to > start reconsidering my donations. > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 3:42 PM Derick Rethans <derick@php.net> wrote: > >> On 10 June 2024 21:17:38 BST, Lanre <lnearwaju@gmail.com> wrote: >> >You guys are killing PHP. There is a lot of work to be done on the engine >> >to modernize it and make it more robust and sturdy. Shit like this just >> >adds more complexity to PHP in the name of convenience. I think this is >> my >> >cue to explore other languages for handling requests >> >> >> Please moderate your language. >> >> Posts like this do nothing except a higher chance for people to ignore >> you, when you've actual points to make, such as credible suggestions as to >> how to make PHP "more rubust and sturdy". >> >> Looking forwards to your RFCs and patches. >> >> cheers >> Derick >> > Sometimes people grow in a different direction than a project and that's okay, you should do what you feel is best for you. Even if that means you will no longer be enriching us with your presence, I think the PHP project will eventually recover from such great loss.