Re: [RFC] Lazy Objects
| From: | Tim Düsterhus | Date: | Sun, 30 Jun 2024 13:20:40 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Lazy Objects | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-124091@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi
On 6/22/24 00:22, Benjamin Außenhofer wrote:
Given the complexities of newLazy* already, i am just trying to find arguments to keep the public surface of this API as small as posisble, as its intricacies are hard to grasp and simplicity / less ways to use it will be a benefit. So far i don't see that with resetAsLazy* you can impmlement something new that cannot also be done with newLazy* methods.For the record, I share these concerns and also mentioned them in the email that I just sent. I've also previously asked this in this email, including the named constructor as a workaround, just as Benjamin did: https://externals.io/message/123503#123525 Best regards Tim Düsterhus