Re: [RFC] Lazy Objects

Hi, Minor point: Why is the $initializer return type null, instead of void? I >> don't see a purpose to allowing an explicit null return and nothing else.. >> > > Updated to use "void". Both would work :) > > Super minor nitpick: You have updated the prototype, but not the explanation text which still says: When initialization is required, the $initializer is called with the object > as first parameter. The initializer should initialize the object, and must > return null (or void). See the “Initialization Sequence” section. > However, given the :void return type, you can’t return null - that would be a fatal error. The phrase should probably be When initialization is required, the $initializer is called with the object > as first parameter. The initializer should initialize the object. See the > “Initialization Sequence” section. > Philip