Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Transform exit() from a language construct into a standard function
| From: | Gina P. Banyard | Date: | Tue, 13 Aug 2024 12:43:52 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Transform exit() from a language construct into a standard function | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-124917@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tuesday, 13 August 2024 at 14:05, Matthew Sewell <php@sewell.info> wrote:
> > On 13 Aug 2024, at 12:36, Gina P. Banyard internals@gpb.moe wrote:
> >
> > On Tuesday, 30 July 2024 at 11:49, Gina P. Banyard internals@gpb.moe wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Internals,
> > >
> > > I have just opened the vote for the "Transform exit() from a language construct
> > > into a standard function" RFC:
> > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/exit-as-function
> > >
> > > The vote will last for two weeks until the 13th of August 2024.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Gina P. Banyard
> >
> > Hello Internals,
> >
> > I just closed the vote.
> >
> > The final results are 24 votes in favour and 12 against.
> > Meaning it has reached the 2/3 threshold required for an RFC to be accepted.
> > This is closer than I'd like, but I guess I'll take it.
> >
> > Thank you to everyone that has voted.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Gina P. Banyard
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Were there more discussions on this off the list? I presume there are often discussions
> elsewhere between the core group of internal developers.
>
> It's just I never saw a confirmed answer on the Xdebug issue but did see a significant
> drop off in no votes without any further explanation (appreciating that no-one has to give an
> explanation) in the last couple of days.
>
> Did the issue get resolved?
>
> Thanks very much,
>
> Matt
Derick has told me off list that Tim's patches look reasonable.
Best regards,
Gina P. Banyard