Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Transform exit() from a language construct into a standard function
| From: | Matthew Sewell | Date: | Tue, 13 Aug 2024 16:20:36 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Transform exit() from a language construct into a standard function | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-124923@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> On 13 Aug 2024, at 13:43, Gina P. Banyard <internals@gpb.moe> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 13 August 2024 at 14:05, Matthew Sewell <php@sewell.info> wrote:
>
>>> On 13 Aug 2024, at 12:36, Gina P. Banyard internals@gpb.moe wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, 30 July 2024 at 11:49, Gina P. Banyard internals@gpb.moe wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello Internals,
>>>>
>>>> I have just opened the vote for the "Transform exit() from a language
>>>> construct into a standard function" RFC:
>>>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/exit-as-function
>>>>
>>>> The vote will last for two weeks until the 13th of August 2024.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Gina P. Banyard
>>>
>>> Hello Internals,
>>>
>>> I just closed the vote.
>>>
>>> The final results are 24 votes in favour and 12 against.
>>> Meaning it has reached the 2/3 threshold required for an RFC to be accepted.
>>> This is closer than I'd like, but I guess I'll take it.
>>>
>>> Thank you to everyone that has voted.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Gina P. Banyard
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Were there more discussions on this off the list? I presume there are often discussions
>> elsewhere between the core group of internal developers.
>>
>> It's just I never saw a confirmed answer on the Xdebug issue but did see a significant
>> drop off in no votes without any further explanation (appreciating that no-one has to give an
>> explanation) in the last couple of days.
>>
>> Did the issue get resolved?
>>
>> Thanks very much,
>>
>> Matt
>
> Derick has told me off list that Tim's patches look reasonable.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Gina P. Banyard
Thank you very much for the response (and the RFC!).
Best wishes,
Matt