Re: [Concept] Flip relative function lookup order (global, then local)
| From: | Nick Lockheart | Date: | Fri, 23 Aug 2024 08:08:25 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [Concept] Flip relative function lookup order (global, then local) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-125109@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
>
> If we were to go with any major change in the current lookup where it
> is perf or nothing, this is what I would propose for php 9.0
> (starting with an immediate deprecation):
> 1. any unqualified call simply calls the current namespace
> 2. >= php 9.0: no fallback to global
> 3. < php 9.0: emit deprecation notice if falls back to global
> This is how classes work (pretty sure), so it would be consistent.
>
> Going the other way (global first) doesn't really make sense because
> it is inconsistent, IMHO. Will it suck? Probably. Will it be easy to
> fix? Probably via Rector.
>
> — Rob
A third option, which I haven't seen come up on the list yet, is that
unqualified functions that are PHP built-ins are treated as global, and
using a function having the same name as a built-in, in a namespace
scope, requires a fully qualified name to override the built-in.
It seems that if someone is writing
array_key_exists() or similar
they probably mean the built-in function, and in the rare cases where
they do mean \foo\array_key_exists(), they can write it explicitly.
Functions that are *not* on the built-in function list could default to
the local namespace.