Re: [RFC] Static Constructor

From: Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 01:29:13 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] Static Constructor
References: 1 2 3 4 5  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-125331@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 2024-08-28 09:51, Bilge wrote:
On 19/06/2024 19:25, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
Hi On 6/19/24 16:03, Erick de Azevedo Lima wrote:
I have considered some names, actually. I just chose this one for the implementation because I tried to design it to be as close as possible to the C# implementation and they call it "static constructor". But the name can be changed to another one without any problem at all.
I would suggest __constructStatic(). This matches the existing naming pattern of __callStatic() being the companion to __call(). Best regards Tim Düsterhus
Why can't it just be public static function __construct()? Cheers, Bilge
Two functions with the same name in the same class?

« previous php.internals (#125331) next »