Re: [Pre-RFC Discussion] User Defined Operator Overloads (again)
| From: | Mike Schinkel | Date: | Wed, 18 Sep 2024 00:56:11 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [Pre-RFC Discussion] User Defined Operator Overloads (again) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-125611@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> On Sep 17, 2024, at 8:05 PM, Jordan LeDoux <jordan.ledoux@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 3:44 PM Mike Schinkel <mike@newclarity.net
> <mailto:mike@newclarity.net>> wrote:
> <snip>
> Almost everything you have said are things that I have talked about or been asked about for
> years. That is why I have been fairly dismissive about them so far, not because I disagree. I am
> well familiar with these discussions, and I was hoping to get new feedback and thoughts through this
> thread. To hear specifics.
>
> The specifics I hear from you is something along the lines of "as long as you give me a
> way to force all my code, even code other developers wrote, to ignore this feature, I am fine with
> it". That's not really a helpful position at all, even if it IS a valid one.
Since you you do not share my concerns related to your RFC I will not spend any more time on this
topic.
I would close with best of luck, but honestly, I hope for PHP's sake the results are the same
as last time.
-Mike