Re: Optional interfaces

On Sat, Nov 16, 2024, at 10:02, Juris Evertovskis wrote: > Is there some reason you cannot do this: > > https://3v4l.org/hF1vr > > Unless I’m missing something, you can’t patch-define a namespaced OptionalInterface that > easily. > > Anyway, I was not implying this is something impossible to accomplish. My point is that it > would be beneficial to have syntax for expressing “if your app has this interface, our class > implements it”. > > Juris Yeah, I get it now (see my reply to Marco). Even with namespaces, it is pretty straightforward, though: https://3v4l..org/dmXoB — Rob