Re: Optional interfaces
| From: | Valentin Udaltsov | Date: | Sat, 16 Nov 2024 11:43:21 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Optional interfaces | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-125973@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sat, 16 November 2024 at 13:42 Rob Landers <rob@bottled.codes> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2024, at 10:02, Juris Evertovskis wrote:
>
> Is there some reason you cannot do this:
>
>
>
> https://3v4l.org/hF1vr
>
>
>
> Unless I’m missing something, you can’t patch-define a namespaced
> OptionalInterface that easily.
>
>
>
> Anyway, I was not implying this is something impossible to accomplish. My
> point is that it would be beneficial to have syntax for expressing “if your
> app has this interface, our class implements it”.
>
>
>
> Juris
>
>
> Yeah, I get it now (see my reply to Marco).
>
> Even with namespaces, it is pretty straightforward, though:
> https://3v4l.org/dmXoB
>
> — Rob
>
This is a nice solution.
However, interface_exists should be used for interfaces.
--
Valentin
>