Re: [RFC] [Discussion] Deprecate PEAR and recommend Composer
| From: | Jakub Zelenka | Date: | Sun, 12 Oct 2025 08:58:19 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] [Discussion] Deprecate PEAR and recommend Composer | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-128818@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sun, Oct 12, 2025 at 5:30 AM Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2025 at 2:13 AM Jakub Zelenka <bukka@php.net> wrote:
>
> > Ok so I guess the current status is kind on unknown... :) But as noted
> by Rowan in other email, there's a mention of the PEAR Group that is the
> governing body of the project although seems expired so I have really no
> idea what the governance there is and if the RFC process should have any
> power over that project.
> >
> >> > I don't think that any current core developer has access to their GH
> organizattion. Or do you still have access / control to do any changes
> there and make it deprecated? My main issue with this RFC is that it's
> about project that we don't effectively control and I'm not sure here is
> anyone who can make any such change to it. From what I see it's currently
> maintained by Chuck who, I guess, also control the project. Or am I wrong?
> >>
> >> I do have access, I did not check the role tho'.
> >>
> >
> > I guess this is really the crucial part here. Are you able / willing /
> comfortable to potentially update the website or the tool if we approve the
> RFC about deprecation and are you sure that the current maintainer is ok
> with that (basically respect RFC as the governance method for PEAR)?
>
> To make it simple, PEAR is part of the PHP projects. There was a
> separate group to do the admin work, security releases when needed,
> sync with php releases to bundle it, etc.
>
> For the purpose of fading out pear, and, more importantly, pecl, we
> can handle it here using the normal RFC flow. Most of the group
> members are barely (f.e. me) or not active at all anymore.
>
Ok, if you say so and can make such change, I think we should put this RFC
back for discussion.
Kind regards
Jakub