Re: [RFC] [Discussion] array_get and array_has functions

From: Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2026 08:22:18 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] [Discussion] array_get and array_has functions
References: 1  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-130567@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Sunday 05 April 2026 08:51:30 (+02:00), Rob Landers wrote: > On Sat, Apr 4, 2026, at 16:06, Barel wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to open the discussion on my proposal to add two small, focused array > > functions for retrieving and checking nested array elements using dot notation. > > > > This is the link to the RFC: > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/array_get_and_array_has > > > > This is the link to the proposed implementation: > > https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/21637 > > > > Thanks!! > > > > Carlos > > Hi Barel, > > Interesting! As dot-notation isn't used anywhere else, and I don't see it discussed > as part of the RFC, how are developers to prevent injections of dots in user input? With SQL, we > have parameters and escaping ... but I don't see any of that here. > > As an example: > > $user = [ 'data' => [...], 'password' => 'secret' ]; > > If the path is completely user-controlled (as in the examples given), then they can access > sensitive information in the array. Even if it is prefixed, ie., "data.%s" -- an attacker > can simply enumerate all possible keys and subkeys. > > As it stands, it appears to add a new vulnerability to PHP that will be unfamiliar with PHP > developers -- unless they're using a framework that already does this sort of notation. I wouldn’t go that far, but I’d like to start by emphasizing that the dot notation described here clearly does not provide a mechanism for escaping the dot. That’s probably a shortcoming, but if any user-supplied string key poses a security risk, then PHP arrays are also affected, and this vulnerability would be nothing new! (Rather, it would be to be expected.) -- hakre

« previous php.internals (#130567) next »