Re: Re: [RFC] __exists(), a magic method for distinguishing "missing" from "set to null"
| From: | Tim Düsterhus | Date: | Mon, 18 May 2026 20:25:14 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [RFC] __exists(), a magic method for distinguishing "missing" from "set to null" | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-130950@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi
On 5/18/26 22:16, Nicolas Grekas wrote:
Are there any new comments on this RFC? I may start the vote this week-end if not. Let me know!Two weeks of discussion are probably a little too short for an RFC of this complexity and impact on long-standing semantics. As for myself: Last week was mini-vacation + conference week (phpday 2026) and between that and my day-job I did not yet have the time to give the RFC a proper week, so I would like to ask for some additional time. I hope to be able to give the RFC a first pass this week. Best regards Tim Düsterhus