Re: Re: [RFC] __exists(), a magic method for distinguishing "missing" from "set to null"

Le lun. 18 mai 2026 à 22:25, Tim Düsterhus <tim@bastelstu.be> a écrit : > Hi > > On 5/18/26 22:16, Nicolas Grekas wrote: > > Are there any new comments on this RFC? I may start the vote this > week-end > > if not. > > Let me know! > > Two weeks of discussion are probably a little too short for an RFC of > this complexity and impact on long-standing semantics. As for myself: > Last week was mini-vacation + conference week (phpday 2026) and between > that and my day-job I did not yet have the time to give the RFC a proper > week, so I would like to ask for some additional time. I hope to be able > to give the RFC a first pass this week. > > Of course, let me reset the counter today then. I'd be happy to gather more feedback also, to be confident we have an informed consensus before opening the vote. Nicolas