Re: [RFC] Working Groups
| From: | Larry Garfield | Date: | Wed, 03 Jun 2026 20:30:01 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Working Groups | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-131126@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, May 26, 2026, at 11:15 AM, Ben Ramsey wrote:
> I'm opening discussion on an RFC to create a policy for PHP project
> working groups:
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/working_groups
>
> The RFC "establishes a framework for the creation, operation, and
> dissolution of working groups within the PHP Project. It provides a
> structured, transparent mechanism for managing discrete projects or
> activities (whether technical, infrastructural, or otherwise) undertaken
> by the Community. As such, it ensures that each working group is clearly
> chartered, time-bound, and actively led, thereby addressing
> organizational gaps that often leave new and existing volunteers
> uncertain about who to talk to or how to contribute."
>
> I created the first draft of this RFC a few years ago but decided
> against formally proposing and discussing it on the list. Roman's recent
> social media policy RFC[1] made me change my mind. I think the time for
> defining formal working groups in the PHP project is here.
>
> Under a working groups policy, someone could propose a marketing
> communications working group to manage and make decisions about how the
> PHP project communicates with its community.
>
> Another example is that someone (i.e., Derick) could propose an
> infrastructure working group for managing all the systems, credentials,
> etc. for the PHP project. This group already exists informally, but a
> working group would formalize it. (A potential charter for such a
> working group is provided as an example in the RFC.)
>
> Cheers,
> Ben
>
>
> [1]: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/social-media-policy
I'm not sure why this has gotten so little (any?) feedback. It's actually incredibly
important to help unblock a lot of support tasks for the PHP project and ecosystem. I fully support
this proposal.
--Larry Garfield