Re: [RFC] Function Autoloading (mark 5)
| From: | Paul M. Jones | Date: | Wed, 15 Jul 2026 18:35:25 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Function Autoloading (mark 5) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-131945@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi all,
> On Jul 14, 2026, at 19:57, Paul M. Jones <pmjones@pmjones.io> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Jul 13, 2026, at 15:08, Paul M. Jones <pmjones@pmjones.io> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Tim,
>>
>>
>>> On Jul 13, 2026, at 13:04, Tim Düsterhus <tim@bastelstu.be> wrote:
>>>
>>> I believe the
strict_namespace=1 directive is a
>>> sufficiently unrelated concern - with enormous bikeshedding potential on its own [1], but also
>>> sufficient usefulness on its own - such that I feel it should be its own RFC that is a prerequisite
>>> to this one. It should not be piggy-backed onto function autoloading.
>>
>> I'm good with that. I'll prepare a separate RFC and remove that from the
>> function-autoloading one.
>
> Done: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/strict-namespace
>
> I will update the function autoloading RFC as needed to refer back to strict-namespace instead
> of incorporating it.
The RFC has been updated to un-incorporate the strict-namespace elements; if there are no further
substantive comments, I would like to open the vote in 2-ish weeks.
-- pmj