Re: Re: Before March 1st aka PHP 5.1 beta
| From: | Ryan King | Date: | Fri, 18 Feb 2005 03:38:44 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Before March 1st aka PHP 5.1 beta | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-15082@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Feb 17, 2005, at 2:55 PM, Jason Garber wrote:
Attachment: [application/pkcs7-signature] smime.p7s
Hello, Speaking of these matters, how about implementing functions within interfaces?That is by definition impossible. Instead of being an interface, it would be an implementation. -ryan
-- Best regards,-- http://theryanking.com/blogJason mailto:jason@ionzoft.comThursday, February 17, 2005, 5:46:08 PM, you wrote: RK> Okay, I'll accept the "no" of course, but I am curious.. Is it an RK> implementation problem with the current engine? Saying that using interfaces RK> discards the MI issue is nonsense imho, because I can't implement any RK> functions in an interface. RK> So why is this such a big "no"? Implementation problem or is it against a RK> certain PHP philosophy? RK> Ron RK> "Marcus Boerger" <helly@php.net> wrote in message RK> news:1334163369.20050217233233@marcus-boerger.de...RK> somethingHello Ron, Thursday, February 17, 2005, 11:10:55 PM, you wrote:A little offtopic, but I'm still curious.. is multiple inheritence-- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.phpwe might see appearing in 5.2 ?Definitively not. You may raise this question prior to PHP 6, However still getting the answer 'no'. The concept simply doesn't match with PHP and since we have multiple inheritance for interfaces that's enough. Best regards,Marcus mailto:helly@php.net
Attachment: [application/pkcs7-signature] smime.p7s