Re: Re: References Problem Patch
| From: | Todd Ruth | Date: | Mon, 30 May 2005 16:38:56 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: References Problem Patch | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-16329@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Derick,
Thank you! Thank you! Thank you!
The problems with references are one of the main reasons I watch this
list. As others have stated, with many tens of thousands of lines of
code, it is extremely painful to figure out which misplaced or missing
"&" has caused php to lose its mind. The fact that php loses its mind
in these cases has left me with the impression that php is sort of a
second class language. Putting the reference bugs to rest are the
most important bug fixes I can imagine. (No, I don't think it will
be feasible for us to move to php 5 anytime soon.)
Thank you!
- Todd Ruth
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 16:44 +0200, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Mon, 30 May 2005, Christian Schneider wrote:
>
> > Derick Rethans wrote:
> > > >If you decide not to fix the 4.x branch then we'd minimally need an easily
> > > >accessible document describing the known problems and work-arounds IMHO.
> > >
> > > As I tried to do that in our large code base, I would say that's totally not
> > > possible to do. There is no way you know you're doing someting wrong, as
> > > there are no warnings and go through 200k+ lines of code without missing an
> > > instance is impossible.
> >
> > That's a misunderstanding then. I was meaning work-arounds on the user side
> > like avoiding certain constructs.
>
> That's what I meant too. "Our large code base" is a PHP application.
>
> Derick
>