Re: Reference Notice
| From: | Matthew Charles Kavanagh | Date: | Sun, 17 Jul 2005 22:06:09 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Reference Notice | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-17289@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
It's a notice. Your soul won't curdle and fall out of your ears just
because your code produces a notice which you can easily prevent from
being output.
Robert Cummings wrote:
>I think the reference notice stuff is a bit ridiculous. I mean I can
>understand the concern behind:
>
> function &foo()
> {
> return $fee.$fii;
> }
>
>But I mean the following gives errors too which is a bit too anal
>retentive even for my liking:
>
> function &foo()
> {
> $fee = 'bullshitBullshitBullshit';
>
> return $fee;
> }
>
> function &fee()
> {
> return foo();
> }
>
> fee();
>
>Anyways my two cents. Seems moronic that I now need to worry about
>stupid reference notices X levels deep in the code for functions that
>I'm consuming. I gueeeeeeeeeeeeess I can assign return values EVERYWHERE
>to temporary variables just to get rid of the notices, but really,
>shouldn't the engine be happy enough returning references to it's own
>intermediate variable? I mean, heck, the engine knows enough to print a
>warning, it can do the work-- and a hell of a lot faster than developers
>having to temporarily assign everything.
>
>Cheers,
>Rob.
>
>