Re: Reference Notice
| From: | Rasmus Lerdorf | Date: | Sun, 17 Jul 2005 23:52:27 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Reference Notice | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-17296@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Yes, we know there are still some issues here. People are working on
it. Or there is at least intent to work on it. See
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=33643
-Rasmus
Robert Cummings wrote:
> I think the reference notice stuff is a bit ridiculous. I mean I can
> understand the concern behind:
>
> function &foo()
> {
> return $fee.$fii;
> }
>
> But I mean the following gives errors too which is a bit too anal
> retentive even for my liking:
>
> function &foo()
> {
> $fee = 'bullshitBullshitBullshit';
>
> return $fee;
> }
>
> function &fee()
> {
> return foo();
> }
>
> fee();
>
> Anyways my two cents. Seems moronic that I now need to worry about
> stupid reference notices X levels deep in the code for functions that
> I'm consuming. I gueeeeeeeeeeeeess I can assign return values EVERYWHERE
> to temporary variables just to get rid of the notices, but really,
> shouldn't the engine be happy enough returning references to it's own
> intermediate variable? I mean, heck, the engine knows enough to print a
> warning, it can do the work-- and a hell of a lot faster than developers
> having to temporarily assign everything.