Re: Property Overloading RFC

Derick Rethans wrote:

I updated the proposal: http://files.derickrethans.nl/property_overloading.html If nobody as any better idea on how to solve it I'd like to start implementing it.

I seem to remember that we had some voices here stating that the current mechanisms are sufficient. Adding new keywords and/or new magic methods is something which should have a very high threshold as it complicates the language. To me the proposal looks like a worst of both worlds kind of compromise: Add new keywords and magic methods coupled with (ab)using the (in this context somewhat inelegant) __get/__set mechanism. So I'd rather not see this implemented to be honest. - Chris