Re: Property Overloading RFC

From: Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 08:17:50 +0000
Subject: Re: Property Overloading RFC
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-18505@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
DR>>Problem 1 is the least of the 3 problems, but introducing the keyword DR>>also helps solving the other two. Strangely enough it is the agument I happen to hear most. I think it's not PHP problem at all. DR>>If I'm not wrong, __isset() checks if something is *set* not if it's DR>>available. The reason for __have_prop() is to check whether something is DR>>declaread as "property" in the class. There is no other way of doing DR>>that unless we'd like to break BC. That, however, does not answer my second question - when __have_prop would be called by the engine and if never, what prevents you from calling any method __have_prop just now? DR>>If it returns false, the engine can throw an error on the line where DR>>it was used, not inside the __get() method itself, as that doesn't DR>>help debugging your code (as you don't usually know where it was DR>>called from). That I understand. However, you still don't have means to know _what_ was wrong in this line. BTW, how comes you don't know where it came from if you have backtrace? -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ +972-3-6139665 ext.115

« previous php.internals (#18505) next »