Re: 5.1.0RC2

I agree with Edin. To be consistent, either all interfaces and classes should be prefixed or none should be prefixed. On the other hand, prefixing all the old classes/interfaces will cause BC breaks. <shameless-plug> This is one case where namespaces are useful. With my namespace patch, all that would have to be done is to name the class as SPL:Observer. Users can either implement SPL:Observer or first "import SPL:Observer;" and then implement Observer. </shameless-plug> Regards, Jessie "Edin Kadribasic" <edink@emini.dk> wrote in message news:43283A26.7060000@emini.dk... > Marcus Boerger wrote: > > Hello Zeev, > > > > i tried to get any feedback from You or andi regarding SPL but none of you > > replied so far. Question is whether i should rename some of the new interfaces > > and classes to be prefixed by 'Spl'. Also should i drop all constants in SPL > > and instead provide class constants whcih we can do right now? Yes i know > > that might be BC issue but i'd say it is worth the little break and i am > > quite sure we shouldn't do it after 5.1 is out. And Last but not least i'd > > like to MFH two of the new classes if you don#t mind. > > Hm, prefixing "new" interfaces and classes with Spl is the worst thing > one could do IMHO. Wouldn't it be the best to prefix *all* Spl > interfaces and classes? > > Edin