Re: 5.1.0RC2

Hello Edin, well imho it makes no sense to prefix all the iterators with Spl and also most of them are released already with 5.0. Changing those is to big of a BC issue isn't it? I mean it is different from changing a few consts very rarely used to class consts. marcus Wednesday, September 14, 2005, 4:56:38 PM, you wrote: > Marcus Boerger wrote: >> Hello Zeev, >> >> i tried to get any feedback from You or andi regarding SPL but none of you >> replied so far. Question is whether i should rename some of the new interfaces >> and classes to be prefixed by 'Spl'. Also should i drop all constants in SPL >> and instead provide class constants whcih we can do right now? Yes i know >> that might be BC issue but i'd say it is worth the little break and i am >> quite sure we shouldn't do it after 5.1 is out. And Last but not least i'd >> like to MFH two of the new classes if you don#t mind. > Hm, prefixing "new" interfaces and classes with Spl is the worst thing > one could do IMHO. Wouldn't it be the best to prefix *all* Spl > interfaces and classes? > Edin Best regards, Marcus