Re: Re: Named arguments revisited

Hi, On Friday 13 January 2006 21:41, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote: > you missed that the parameter name information is just not available > for internal functions, the api works by parameter positions only > right now, so at some level you *have to* add this information for > all the 4,000+ extension funcitons out there ... You can use the ARG_INFO stuff to name parameters (like done in SPL or the Exception base class) so the name "just" needs to be added where wanted. A benefit from named parameters compared to array based stuff would be that an IDE might give better completion support. This doesn't mean I have real need for named parameters and as Andi said we shouldn't add every feature one might add. johannes