Re: Re: Named arguments revisited
| From: | Zeev Suraski | Date: | Sun, 15 Jan 2006 09:20:28 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Named arguments revisited | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-21535@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
At 09:51 15/01/2006, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Aidan Lister wrote:As Andi said, that's hardly the big issue (we could have provided it as a userland feature, not applicable to internal functions, or applicable to just a small subset of them). The big issue is whether or not we want that feature in the language, and the answer appears to be no. ZeevAre the PHP group prepared to accept and implement a named parameters patch?As far as I am concerned it would depend on the patch. If you can come up with a way to do it with requiring rewriting all 4000+ functions out there, go for it.