Re: True labelled breaks
| From: | Derick Rethans | Date: | Tue, 21 Feb 2006 10:57:41 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: True labelled breaks | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-21971@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Steph Fox wrote:
> > > Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
> > > > Wez Furlong wrote:
> > > > > I think not many people use it because it's difficult to use.
> > > > > Having real labels might change that.
> > > > > Personally, I'd prefer real goto, as I've stated in the past.
> > > > > Just for the record again, I'm +1 for goto, and +0.5 for labelled
> > > > > breaks only if we've totally given up on goto.
> > > >
> > > > FULLACK
> > >
> > > +1
> >
> > Same here, +1 on full goto. And if not then the PDM result. Labelled
> > breaks are inadequate IMO.
>
> One more time: labelled breaks weren't offered as an _alternative_ to goto.
> Why are you bringing this to the forum now?
I am replying to the thread? Is that an offensive or something?
Derick