Re: [PATCH] Late Static Binding
| From: | Marcus Boerger | Date: | Wed, 01 Mar 2006 17:24:07 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Late Static Binding | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-22060@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hello Lukas,
no the way things are now are just as expected.
marcus
Wednesday, March 1, 2006, 6:08:23 PM, you wrote:
> Zeev Suraski wrote:
>> 1. I don't think it's a very important feature, even though like any
>> other feature we could possibly think of, we can come with use cases
>> where it would be useful. In terms of complexity vs. usefulness, I
>> think it's more complex than useful.
> So how about this ... make late static binding the default.
> The point is: late static binding is the "intuitive" thing to happen
> when inheriting static methods. So the way things are right now are more
> complex due to a performance optimization.
> regards,
> Lukas
Best regards,
Marcus