Re: Re: RFC: unicode.semantics: runtime or not?

From: Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 01:30:29 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: RFC: unicode.semantics: runtime or not?
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-25562@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Andrei Zmievski wrote:
1. ZEND_INI_SYSTEM and make people run two copies of Apache if they want both modes. This is architecturally more simple and more robust, I believe. 2. ZEND_INI_PERDIR and let people switch modes as described above. This is a lot of work and will probably result in quite a few edge cases where we used to rely on stability of one mode (such as APC or serialization, for example).
I think it would be best for all of us to go the more robust route and make unicode.semantics only changeable in php.ini.
I concur.
Me too, if it counts any. I think the people that really need Unicode support (aka most of the world) will have it enabled as soon as it's possible to do so, and those that don't (USA and some of Europe) won't care about it enough to adopt until they get a Chinese client or so. At which point they'll have to change their ideas anyway... - Steph
regards, Derick


« previous php.internals (#25562) next »