Re: Why is mktime(0,0,0,0,0,0) E_STRICT?
| From: | Derick Rethans | Date: | Mon, 23 Oct 2006 08:19:11 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Why is mktime(0,0,0,0,0,0) E_STRICT? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-26170@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
> > > Yes, I see no point in pushing this responsibility into the userland,
> > > especially since its a BC break appearently.
> >
> > There is no BC break:
>
> I meant, there would be a BC break if this feature gets dropped, which is the
> point of the message, right?
Yeah, but there is no point in calling mktime() without arguments as you
can use time() doing the same. It's just a friendly hint that you're
wasting CPU cycles. It's an E_STRICT message for ****s sake.
regards,
Derick