Re: Namespaces in PHP 6 - ++$take

Why not add another bug-status called "incomplete" or something, and append a standard message saying "Please study the bug-reporting guidelines in order to write complete and accurate bug reports."? I think this tiny addition to tagging something "bogus" would make a lot of bug reporters happier and it might make them fix their bug report. -- Ron "Rasmus Lerdorf" <rasmus@lerdorf.com> schreef in bericht news:455CB6BD.2080806@lerdorf.com... > Richard Lynch wrote: >> On Sat, November 11, 2006 7:37 am, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: >>> helping to get rid of bogus reports or translating the really bad >>> reports into a simple reproducable test case is often the part that >> >> This is a plea for not being quite so bogus-trigger-happy as we have >> in the past. >> >> Many correct, if incomplete, bug reports get quickly labeled "bogus" >> with no real research, and that only makes it even harder for anybody >> to do anything useful... >> >> I know it's [hard] work to wade through those things, to some degree, >> but you make your life more miserable with incorrect assessment. :-) >> >> Please do not take this request amiss! It is an attempt, however >> small, to make your life better, not to complain about your efforts! > > I think lagging 6-12 months behind on bug reports would be much worse. > If the bug report is incomplete and isn't likely to lead to a resolution > I think it is better to let the reporter know sooner rather than later. > The fact that we only have 2 or 3 people regularly looking at these and > the flow of them is ever increasing doesn't leave us with much choice > here. If more people helped out we could spend more time on each one, > but until that happens, the quick-bogus is going to continue. > > -Rasmus