Re: Moving COM, Socket & mhash to PECL

At 21:51 08/12/2006, Derick Rethans wrote:

On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: This is an exploratory e-mail, so don't panic just yet :-). I am thinking of moving the COM, mhash and socket extensions to PECL in 5.2 and 6.0 releases and was hoping to hear for & against arguments. The reason for the making this move are as follows: COM: -1, but we need somebody to have a look at the issues there. mhash: +1 sockets: -1 in 5.x, +1 in 6.0 as there are still many people who use this stuff. Also we need to make sure that all the stuff done by ext/socket can also be done by the streams in some way.

Same as Derick and Stas. Zeev