Re: RE : [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src(PHP_5_2) / run-tests.php

On that note - is there a formal process in place for deciding what gets moved from PCEL to 'Optional Extension' and vice-versa? Who has final say in the matter? -- Jim On 2/9/07, LAUPRETRE François (P) <francois.laupretre@ratp.fr> wrote:

From: Derick Rethans [mailto:derick@php.net] On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg wrote:

I read this as saying we're removing the entire ereg extension from PHP 6. If that's not true, then never mind.

http://www.php.net/~derick/meeting-notes.html#move-ereg-to-pecl From what I read there, it was decided to unbudle the regex library and to make ereg an extension, not to move this new ereg extension to PECL. There is a big difference between making ereg an optional feature and moving it to PECL ! So, as I am tired to see features I use every day planned for removal from the core, I'd like to see another justification. IMHO, the ereg extension should be changed to an optional extension, but bundled with the PHP distribution. François -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php