Re: bug tracker merging

On 5/30/07, Steph Fox <steph@zend.com> wrote:

Hi Jani, sorry didn't realize this was a public exchange. ATM I'm focusing only in getting all the projects (pear,php,pecl) to use same codebase for their bugtrackers in this first phase. At the risk of boring you, I'll repeat: 'Hmm.... I'm not familiar with PEAR code base, but I can appreciate it's had more love than the others.'

Basically the PEAR codebase is an updated and upgrade version of the PECL codebase, shouldn't be too complicated to do

Solving commit merge problems through adding some magic "link to bug" thing in commits sounds so wrong to me..there's so much "fuzziness" involved. Again at the risk of... 'You were all for it some hours ago! And it wasn't 'link to bug', it was 'create bug report'. For maintenance fixes only.' This pear bugtracker has some features that might be somehow useful, but I'm not familiar with those, so I leave that to Gregory for now. (patch-tracker and roadmaps) --Jani p.s. Yes, I'm going to Norway next week.. See ya there! -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

-- David Coallier, Founder & Software Architect, Agora Production (http://agoraproduction.com) 51.42.06.70.18