Re: bug tracker merging

From: Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 22:51:48 +0000
Subject: Re: bug tracker merging
References: 1 2  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-30019@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Are you using PHPUnit for the unit tests? Also there was some alert stuff that Jim Winstead if I remember correctly was wanting to hook into the mix (it's all commented out from my last look at the bugsweb code), which would be great to allow devs to subscribe to bugs (package / project / etc.) that interests them. Regards --jm On 30 May 2007, at 11:41 PM, Jani Taskinen wrote:
I read this email *AFTER* discussing with Gregory in IRC about current situation of having 3 separate bug trackers in *.php.net. So now I'm hijacking this coincidentally related thread for informing what happened during/after the discussion. :D Gregory Beaver kirjoitti:
I'm a bit concerned by the headlong rush to refactor phpbugsweb to include PEAR and PECL bugs. The concept is fine by me, but starting with phpbugsweb as the starting point is a big mistake if you plan to include PEAR bugs. The PEAR bug tracker has several killer features that you will have to pry from my cold dead fingers before I would accept a merge with the phpbugsweb
I agreed with Gregory that the PEAR version of the original PHP bug tracker code is the best starting point for unified codebase. So now there is pear/Bugtracker in CVS which Gregory created from the current PEAR bug tracker code. This will be the base for the übertracker.
The main problem with the codebase of pearweb/bugs is that it depends on the core of pearweb (bad) and so needs to be independentized, but we are doing this ASAP. roadmap for the website is at http://pear.php.net/bugs/roadmap.php?package=pearweb
I'm dividing the task in hand first into 2 phases required to kickstart this: Phase I (one): - Unified codebase that works for PEAR/PECL/PHP bug trackers using their own databases. (*) * Basically all changes/additions are needed only for current PHP bug db, PEAR/PECL both share the "package/type" concept already. This is my first TODO. Phase II (two): - Add "project" concept into the tracker and merge each database into one, http://bugs.php.net/ will be the only bugtracker for *.php.net, [pear|pecl].php.net/bugs/ can just be redirected there..not to forget php-gtk, etc. When projects are in DB, adding one more will not be hard. :) ..more phases will propably come up later, these 2 are the main targets now.
Of course, it's also in the process of being refactored along with the rest of pearweb (unit tests *gasp*) so please don't discount a look at this codebase, no matter how bigoted against PEAR you might be ;)
I will ignore any unit tests for now. :) --Jani p.s. Any volunteers: You're not needed right now..and most likely not later either. (this is friendly hint to everyone: keep your hands off! :) p.p.s I refuse to discuss things like coding style, using pear/not using pear stuff..etc. Focus! --PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php


« previous php.internals (#30019) next »