Re: PHP5 - OO extensions and naming conventions.
| From: | Andi Gutmans | Date: | Wed, 02 Jul 2003 18:24:55 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PHP5 - OO extensions and naming conventions. | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-3171@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
At 10:37 AM 2/7/2003 -0400, l0t3k wrote:
IIRC there was an informal consensus to use studlyCaps as the official userland convention for OOP extensions (*) (leaving aside the case insensitivity of the language.) my question now concerns accessors. should we prefer properties over propertyGet()/propertySet() accessor functions ? would having both constitute bloat. i ask because im implementing a series of classes mirroring those in the Caffeinated Language (tm) so familiarity could be an asset. l0t3k (*) i wonder if this should be more formalized before the next major release. major extensions like dom/xsl are already using the current method->function_ name() convention.I definitely prefer setXXX()/getXXX() functions over property overloading. Andi