Re: Re: import/use last call
| From: | Marcus Boerger | Date: | Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:48:42 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: import/use last call | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-32967@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hello Sebastian,
erm you are not going to use the stuff then?
marcus
Wednesday, October 24, 2007, 8:11:50 AM, you wrote:
> Gregory Beaver wrote:
>> Giedrius D wrote:
>>> On 10/23/07, Gregory Beaver <greg@chiaraquartet.net> wrote:
>>> Anyway my main question was: is there any reason not to use keyword "use"?
>> The only reason for me is that "use" implies some kind of autoloading,
>> as I suggested in one of my other mails. This gets into parsing
>> semantics, something I'm not interested in doing. If the folks go with
>> "use" that is fine, but for me personally not the best solution, which
>> is why I put hours into making this patch.
> If I directly compare "use" with "import", "import" sounds way
> more like
> "get me that stuff somehow magically" than "use" does.
> - Sebastian
Best regards,
Marcus