Re: Re: import/use last call
| From: | Sebastian Nohn | Date: | Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:54:40 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: import/use last call | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-32969@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Marcus Boerger wrote:
> Hello Sebastian,
>
> erm you are not going to use the stuff then?
Of course. I was just trying to explain, what the plain words sound like
to me.
> marcus
>
> Wednesday, October 24, 2007, 8:11:50 AM, you wrote:
>
>> Gregory Beaver wrote:
>>> Giedrius D wrote:
>>>> On 10/23/07, Gregory Beaver <greg@chiaraquartet.net> wrote:
>
>>>> Anyway my main question was: is there any reason not to use keyword
>>>> "use"?
>
>>> The only reason for me is that "use" implies some kind of autoloading,
>>> as I suggested in one of my other mails. This gets into parsing
>>> semantics, something I'm not interested in doing. If the folks go with
>>> "use" that is fine, but for me personally not the best solution, which
>>> is why I put hours into making this patch.
>
>> If I directly compare "use" with "import", "import" sounds
>> way more like
>> "get me that stuff somehow magically" than "use" does.
- Sebastian