Re: [RFC] An Idea for PDO 2
| From: | Jani Taskinen | Date: | Sat, 02 Feb 2008 19:59:24 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] An Idea for PDO 2 | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.internals php.pdo |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-35111@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Pierre, since you choose to ignore the mails I sent to your "secret" address,
I'm taking this to the list, maybe this will be noticed: Pay what you owe me!
--Jani
Pierre Joye kirjoitti:
Hi, On Feb 2, 2008 12:15 PM, Richard Quadling <rquadling@googlemail.com> wrote:If there is no CLA, will that mean we will not get the PDO 2 drivers we need to be able to communicate with the databases?It would be really nice if the pro CLA camp stops to condition the existence of PDO (or its future) to the CLA acceptation. That's simply wrong. Oracle, IBM and MySql (which states their point already, they will accept the choice made by the php project) contribute already to php. The question is actually: Can they continue to ignore PHP or do they have to have their respective products working smoothly with PHP? The answer is pretty obvious and we see announces on a regular basis to proove they have to support PHP. Read the respective interviews or stories about PHP, the tone is completely different now than a year ago.