Re: [RFC] An Idea for PDO 2

On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 22:11:54 +0100, "Pierre Joye" <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Globally -1. I'm against any CLA in php.net. It was a mistake in the > first place to accept restricted modules. There is many repositories > out there, and the companies that need a CLA also have the resources > to create their own PECL channels. But they may not have the fantastic > advantages brought by being in php.net, like QA, visibility, etc. > > Secondly it is not correct to mix the topics. PDO will have a future, > no matter if we accept a CLA or not. The same companies (I would like > to say, the company) will participate anyway. Their customers need it. > > I think this quote fits well in this thread: > > "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little > Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." > -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 > +1 > -- > Pierre > http://blog.thepimp.net | > http://www.libgd.org > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php ///////////////////////////////////////////////////// Service provided by hitOmeter.NET internet messaging! .