Re: Inclusion of PHP LiteSpeed SAPI in the standard PHP distribution?
| From: | George Wang | Date: | Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:50:19 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Inclusion of PHP LiteSpeed SAPI in the standard PHP distribution? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-36733@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Pierre,
I also prefer BSD license as well, Johannes will make the final call, if he think that it is a show stopper, I will dual-license it.
I have updated lsapi_main.c to address the "{ } after an if statement" issue on the other day. If there is anything need to be taken care, please just let me know.
Hopefully it will appear in the nightly build soon. :-)
Thanks,
George
Pierre Joye wrote:
Hi George, On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 8:11 PM, George Wang <gwang@litespeedtech.com> wrote:Hi Johannes, Thank you for the quick reply.Well, the idea is that all PHP-specific code is licensed under the same license terms. PCRE and GD are external libraries which live outside PHP's context and which are simply bundled. That's why the clear preference there is PHP License.OK, let me make some clarifications on this. the main SAPI code, lsapi_main.c, which is specific for PHP, has been licensed under PHP license. Other c source code are our generic LSAPI library, which will be used for all third parties integrations, those files are licensed under BSD license. I don't mind dual license those code under both BSD and PHP license if required as long as it won't prevent us from using the same code somewhere else under BSD license.I don't think it is necessary. If you like to bundle the LSAPI library, it is perfectly fine to keep it under the BSD license. Cheers,