Re: intl naming

Hi! On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:17 AM, Stanislav Malyshev <stas@zend.com> wrote: > > I hope you are keeping in mind our last discussion here. I also like > > > > Yes, I do. Great, thanks :) > > to know what to think about my API changes proposal and the exception > > usages as it is a relatively important request. Or why are you asking? > > > > I already stated my opinion about exceptions - I consider using them > inappropriate in the context of this extension. However, my question was not > about redesigning the API, but specifically about names. I'm not sure how I should understand that. Does that mean that there is no room to discuss or change anything in intl as long as you don't agree? It may be asked in a rude way but I have hard time to follow the logic behind your requests. > > I really fear to suddenly see a 1.0.0-stable with none of our requests > > inside. > > > > That depends on the requests and timeframe for their execution. Since we > have mostly done the work that was planned for 1.0, I want to close one > question that may change API. Adding features and enhancements is good, but > not right now. If you wish, you may document them as feature requests for > intl package on pecl too. My point did not change. I do think that it is premature for 1.0.0-stable. I understand that you like to be at this stage for the end of this month (5.3) but I don't think we have to hurry up without solving the obvious issues we have. The API is the biggest one. > > The ICU build problem remains as well. I'm not sure it is safe to use > > 2k3 binaries with php VC6 binaries. I wonder how you built it using > > vc2005. It fails with all possible errors here. Any trick? > > > > No trick, just checked out the code, put the libs in ../icu, run configure > and nmake. Checked out? You mean with CVS/SVN? I thought you were using their releases. Cheers, -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org