Re: [RFC] Strict type hints (parameter and return value)

Em Qui, 2008-04-17 às 23:14 +0200, Lars Strojny escreveu: > Hi Felipe, > > first of all, thanks for your proposal. I like it. > > Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2008, 11:42 -0300 schrieb Felipe Pena: > > Hi. > > > > Well, thinking better about the behavior of type hinting, i decided to > > change the proposal for strict type. I.e. don't accept numeric string > > as an intenger, etc. > [...] > > I would also like to see scalar and numeric too, but that's just for the > record. > For ReflectionParameter I would like to see an additional > ReflectionParameter::isType(string $type_name) to allow constructs like > foreach (array("string", "integer") as $type) > if (!$reflection_param->isType($type)) > throw new Exception(); I also thought that when adding the is<type> methods! :D > What about additions in the ReflectionMethod-class? I would say adding > ReflectionMethod::isInt(), ...::isDouble() and isType() would be > appropriate. Sure, should there be! Thanks for remember me. But i think that is<type> as name is confuse in this case. We need a name for that. -- Regards, Felipe Pena.